Reality
weight-loss shows, such as NBC’s The Biggest Loser and ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition, have
captured the attention and the hearts of viewers all over the world and have
proved to be an increasingly popular form of programming on television today.
While it may appear that these shows are supposed to be inspirational and
uplifting, giving life back to those who have lost control of their weight
(because you can only be happy if you’re skinny by societies standards,
right?); in reality, these shows tend to favor the physical transformation of
the contestant rather than the overall health through the constant emphasis
placed on quantitative methods and measures. This often times causes
contestants to take their physical transformations too far, which is the latest
criticism NBC’s The Biggest Loser is currently facing,
reinforcing society’s stigma toward large bodies and emphasizing the idea that
size is a direct correlation to ones happiness, health, and social standing.
NBC’s The Biggest
Loser first aired in 2004 and gained almost immediate popularity among
viewers, bringing in 10 million viewers alone during the first season it
premiered. The reputation of the show continues to rise leaving it “one of the
most popular reality television programs in the United States” (Yoo 294). The Biggest Loser is a reality show that
casts obese contestants all competing with the hopes to win the grand prize of
$250,000 (Can I skip the competition and go straight to the check at the end?).
However, as with everything in life there is always a catch. In this case, the
money is awarded to the contestant who is able to lose the highest percentage
of weight at the end of the show for their final weigh in, in relation to their
starting weight when their journey began. This is where the motives of the show
can be called into question; contestants are presented with the possibility of
winning that kind of money and many would entertain the idea of doing whatever
it takes to win, healthy or not. According to Hines, the most recent winner,
Rachel Fredrickson even admits, "Maybe I was a little
too enthusiastic in my training to get to the finale" (TODAY
Entertainment). In another interview with People Magazine she told reporter, Michelle Tauber, “she had been
taking, maybe three, four classes a day
at the gym, including Zumba and spin” (I’m sorry, but did she just start paying
rent at the gym instead of her home? Did she have a life outside the gym?). While
The Biggest Loser may be stressing
the importance of diet and exercise, which are both great things to focus on
when leading a healthy lifestyle and while trying to lose weight, they are also
promoting an unhealthy amount of weight loss for each of the contestants to
achieve and an intimidating and rigorous competition atmosphere among
contestants. This leaves audience members at home with unrealistic expectations
for their own weight loss ventures (Yoo 295). Therefore, the show quickly goes
from being uplifting and relatable to almost discouraging, because the results
they see are often unrealistic examples.
With an
increasingly popular reputation in the United States also brings unintended
consequences of the show. The Biggest
Loser recently wound up in some trouble when the constant body shaming they
utilize ever so frequently may have took one contestant too far with her
physical transformation. The premise of the show is to take obese contestants
and help them to lose weight; in turn freeing them of potential health problems
they are at risk for when falling under the obese weight range. However, when
Rachel Fredrickson, winner of the most recent season of The Biggest Loser lost more than half of her body weight—people
began to question whether or not the focus of the show was really on the health
of the contestant or the number on the scale (Dewey).
Rachel Fredrickson
started the show weighing in at 260 pounds, technically obese for her 5’4”
frame. However, throughout the course of her weight loss journey on the show
she managed to lose 155 pounds (Oh, so all I have to do is lose more than half
of my body weight to win? Sounds reasonable). That drastic amount of weight
loss left her weighing in at a mere 105 pounds at the finale; she had lost 60
percent of her body weight during her time as a contestant on the show (Dewey).
When she began her
journey she may have been technically obese putting her at risk for certain
health problems, but now weighing in at 105 pounds, she is below her healthy
body mass index; thus, she now falls under the underweight category for her
current BMI (Tauber). This contestant went from overweight to underweight in
less than a year, and yet we are supposed to believe that the show is mainly
concerned about getting us to a healthy weight, promoting a new, healthy
lifestyle for the contestants to maintain after the show.
Many people choose to place full
blame on shows like The Biggest Loser
and Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition,
labeling them as the scapegoat and stirring up controversial conversations that
surround the show. However, what we, as a society, must come to terms with is
that these shows simply reflect the stigma that we all reinforce towards those
with larger body types (Wait what? We actually have to take the blame for
something we reinforce daily? Nah, I’m good, thanks.). Dewey quotes Jillian Lampert,
who currently holds the position of a director at an eating disorder treatment
center in St. Paul stating, “As a society we often criticize people for being
at higher weights — that’s part of why we have the TV show ‘The Biggest Loser’
— and then we feel free to criticize lower weight” (Feel free to feel like
someone just punched you in the stomach from the guilt that you now feel after
reading that quote. I know I did). The stigma society upholds towards body
image is simply unrealistic and extremely unhealthy, which is exactly why many
of these weight loss shows and the contestants on them are going to extreme
measures to try to come even a little bit closer to being accepted by society
for their appearance.
As a society, we continually
correlate a person’s size with happiness, health, and social standing, but what
we often tend to forget is that society’s idea of the perfect size isn’t
necessarily going to be healthy for everyone. There is so much more to take
into account regarding health than simply looking at a person’s physical
appearance and assuming that since they don’t appear to be thin then they must
be unhealthy or overweight. Thus, societal pressures take over, which Brownwell
speaks to, “there is tremendous pressure in American society to be thin
and to have the perfect body shape” (307). Other weight loss shows such as Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition
also contribute to society’s problematic assumption that a person’s size
directly correlates to their health. Tania Lewis states, “These shows tend to
primarily focus on the physical makeover and the apparent magical
transformation that can be brought about via specialist modes of expertise such
as plastic surgery” (290). Sadly, as long as our society continues to view a
certain size range as being ideal or healthy, these shows will continue to
favor the physical makeover the contestant achieves over their general health
improvement as a direct effect that came of their weight loss.
In conclusion,
reality weight-loss shows have proved to be a lasting and loved genre that is
currently permeating the programming on primetime television. At first, these
shows such as The Biggest Loser and Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition may
come across as encouraging, moving, and relatable to audiences nationwide, but
when given a closer look it becomes clear that they may in fact be another
source of reinforcement to the stigma society places on body image. They
highlight the idea that a person’s size can serve as an accurate and direct
correlation to their happiness and health. As long as our culture sees a
specific body type and size range as healthy and ideal, it will continue to
produce reality weight-loss shows so focused on numbers and quantitative
methods that they end up favoring the contestants’ physical makeover, rather
than the vast improvement the weight loss
has had on their health.
Works Cited
Brownell, Kelly D. "Personal
Responsibility and Control Over Our Bodies: When Expectation Exceeds
Reality." Health Psychology 10(5) (1991): 303-10. American
Psychological Association. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
<http://psycnet.apa.org.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/journals/hea/10/5/303.pdf>.
Dewey, Caitlin. "Did This ‘Biggest Loser’
Contestant Lose Too Much Weight?" The Washington Post. N.p., 6 Feb.
2014. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2014/02/06/did-this-biggest-loser-contestant-lose-too-much-weight/>.
Hines, Ree. "'Biggest Loser' Winner
Addresses Eating Disorder Controversy." TODAY Entertainment. N.p.,
12 Feb. 2014. Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
<http://www.today.com/entertainment/biggest-loser-winner-addresses-eating-disorder-controversy-2D12099786>.
Tauber, Michelle. "The Biggest Loser's
Rachel Frederickson: I Exercise Up to Four Times a Day." People.
N.p., 6 Feb. 2014. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
<http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20784458,00.html>.
Yoo, Jina H. "No Clear Winner: Effects Ofon the Stigmatization of
Obese Persons." Health Communication 28.3 (2013): 294-303. Taylor
& Francis Group. Web. 15 Nov. 2013. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2012.684143?journalCode=hhth20#preview>.
Lewis, Tania. "Revealing the Makeover
Show." Revealing the Makeover Show 22, No. 4 (2008): 441-46. Continuum:
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. Web. 15 Nov. 2013. <http://www.tandfonline.com.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/doi/full/10.1080/10304310802190053#.UqZIWaWN0ZY>.
I had never considered these negative impacts but you are completely right. It is entirely possible that this show actually discourages people in the audience from trying to lose weight and be healthy. The intense training they go through on the show would be so daunting to someone who would have to find some motivation other than the huge cash prize. It makes it look that much more impossible. As you mentioned, society's idea of the perfect size isn't going to be healthy for everyone. I'm pretty sure that society's idea of perfect isn't entirely healthy for anyone and yet this show makes you believe that it is achievable. I am not sure size is an accurate measure of health but it is the easiest thing to measure and the most entertaining. Can you imagine if they did this competition based on cholesterol or heart strength or something? It probably would not get much of an audience.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I love your sarcastic comments through out.
You made some pretty interesting points in this post. It does seem common knowledge now that the show that was once praised for promoting weight loss is now criticized for the exact same thing. However I was unaware of the drastic escalation of weight loss seen throughout each season. It is quite shocking that someone could lose over half of her body weight in under a year. I remember watching when people lost weight but were still far from having perfect bodies. I thought that was great. But I agree going from overweight to underweight is going too far. This show and these trainers are supposed to promote healthy lifestyles and that is clearly not the real goal of the show.
ReplyDeleteAnother interesting point you bring up is that this show is only a representation of how American society views obesity, and that shows like this shouldn’t be entirely to blame for this stigma. Clearly this show would not have been so popular if America was not obsessed with weight loss. But I do believe that shows like this, along with other skinny representations in the media, are the direct cause of American society’s obsession. The only thing that can have such a strong influence on society is the media. These body expectations did not come out of nowhere, they were created through representation in the media. Weight loss shows are just another link in the body image chain. America’s perception of what an ideal body image is will not change until representation in the media changes first.